Exploring WebAssembly (WASM)

Introduction to WebAssembly WASM

WebAssembly vs JavaScript

In modern web development, JavaScript and WebAssembly (WASM) power interactive, high-performance applications. This guide compares their strengths, shows how to compile to WASM, and demonstrates a real-world synergy use case.

JavaScript

JavaScript is the de facto scripting language of the web. Every browser supports it, and its mature ecosystem enables rapid UI development.

Key Features

  • Ubiquity
    Supported across all major browsers and platforms.

  • Rich Ecosystem
    Frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue.js accelerate development of SPAs and PWA.

  • Dynamic UI Handling
    Ideal for DOM manipulation, event handling, and real-time updates.

Note

JavaScript engines (V8, SpiderMonkey, WebKit) continually optimize performance.

Real-Time Input Validation

<form id="loginForm">
  <input id="email" type="email" placeholder="Enter your email" />
  <button type="submit">Submit</button>
</form>
<script>
// Real-time validation
const emailInput = document.getElementById('email');
emailInput.addEventListener('input', () => {
  if (!emailInput.validity.valid) {
    emailInput.style.borderColor = 'red';
  } else {
    emailInput.style.borderColor = '';
  }
});
</script>

WebAssembly

WebAssembly delivers near-native speed in browsers. Compile C, C++, or Rust to a compact binary and call it from JavaScript.

Key Features

  • Performance
    Executes compute-intensive code faster than JavaScript.
    The image illustrates a flowchart related to WebAssembly (WASM), showing a sequence from binary code to a configuration or setup icon, and finally to a stopwatch icon, indicating a process or performance aspect.

  • Language Flexibility
    Write in C/C++, Rust, Go, or AssemblyScript, then compile to WASM.
    The image highlights WebAssembly's major strength in performance, noting it is faster than JavaScript for heavy computations.

Warning

WASM binaries can increase payload size. Use gzip compression and code splitting to minimize download time.

Example: Compiling C to WASM

// C code to apply a filter
void applyFilter(int* pixels, int length) {
    for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
        pixels[i] = /* complex filter operation */;
    }
}

Compile with Emscripten:

emcc filter.c -O3 -s WASM=1 -o filter.js

Comparing JavaScript and WebAssembly

FeatureJavaScriptWebAssembly
Language LevelHigh-level scriptingLow-level binary
PerformanceExcellent for UI logicSuperior for CPU-bound workloads
InteroperabilityNative DOM/API supportRequires JavaScript glue code
CompilationJust-in-time (JIT)Ahead-of-time (AOT) binary
Ideal Use CasesEvent handling, DOM updates, I/OVideo processing, gaming, crypto, AI

Synergy: JavaScript + WebAssembly

Combine JavaScript’s DOM access with WASM’s speed to build responsive, compute-heavy applications.
The image illustrates the connection between JavaScript (JS) and WebAssembly (WA), showing how they work together.

Use Case: Image Processing Web App

  1. JavaScript’s Role

    • UI Components: Buttons, sliders, filters.
    • Event Handling: Capture clicks and slider input.
      The image illustrates a flowchart for event handling, showing icons for a webpage, a click action, JavaScript code, and a touch interaction.
    • Progress Feedback: Update progress bars or notifications.
  2. WebAssembly’s Role

    • Heavy Lifting: Apply complex filters in optimized C/C++ or Rust.
      The image shows a flowchart with three icons: a webpage, "WA" (possibly WebAssembly), and a stopwatch with wings, indicating a process related to efficient or fast web performance. The title is "Heavy Lifting."
    • Algorithm Libraries: Reuse existing native libraries for transformations.

By offloading pixel manipulation to WASM and handling UI in JavaScript, the app remains smooth even under heavy computations.
The image illustrates the division of responsibilities between JavaScript (JS) and WebAssembly (WA) with a focus on user experience.

Watch Video

Watch video content

Previous
What is WebAssembly