Fundamentals of DevOps

People

Teams vs Roles Benefits

This article explores positive patterns for DevOps team topologies that foster effective collaboration among development, operations, and other key functions. By highlighting well-established models, we provide insights into creating a strong DevOps culture and streamlining software delivery.

Below, we detail several approaches to integrating teams. Each section includes a diagram that visually reinforces the corresponding model.


Type 1: Developer and Operations Collaboration

This model emphasizes close collaboration between developers and operations, driven by strong technical leadership. When both teams operate as a fully integrated unit with ongoing discussions about software delivery, they can leverage overlapping skills and experiences to enhance the process.

The image is about "DevOps Team Topologies," focusing on Type 1: Dev and Ops Collaboration, featuring a Venn diagram and a person speaking in the corner.


Type 2: Fully Shared Ops Responsibilities

In this approach, development and operations merge into a single, cross-functional team. Best suited for organizations delivering a single product, this model simplifies workflows by uniting all necessary skills in one cohesive unit. Many startups favor this pattern for its straightforward implementation and operational efficiency.

The image describes "Type 2: Fully Shared Ops Responsibilities" in DevOps Topologies, highlighting integration between development and operations teams for organizations with a single web-based product.


Type 3: Infrastructure-as-a-Service Platform

Here, the operations team serves primarily as the maintainer of an internal infrastructure platform or deployment service. Developers interact with this platform via a streamlined interface, which enables smooth and rapid code deployments. This model is increasingly popular with the rise of platform engineering, allowing teams to concentrate on innovation while the platform handles production deployments.


Type 4: DevOps as an External Service

In this model, the DevOps function is provided as a fully managed, external service. Taking care of the complete delivery process—from code commit to production rollout—the external service offers a low-friction, turnkey solution. This approach is particularly beneficial for smaller teams with limited operational expertise.

The image explains "Type 4: DevOps as an External Service" with a Venn diagram and text, highlighting its suitability for smaller teams with limited operational experience.


Type 5: Temporary DevOps Bridge

This pattern establishes a temporary DevOps team that acts as a bridge between development and operations until full integration is achieved. Although designed to ease the transition of responsibilities, if not managed properly, it can lead to challenges and potential inefficiencies.

The image describes "Type 5: DevOps Team with an Expiry Date," highlighting its temporary nature and potential transition to other models, with a diagram and a speaker inset.

Caution

Temporary bridging measures must be carefully planned and executed to avoid becoming a permanent dependency that hinders long-term team integration.


Type 6: Temporary Bridging Teams for Cultural Integration

Similar to Type 5, this approach uses a bridging team to facilitate cultural and operational integration between siloed groups. The goal is to quickly merge diverse teams so that the bridging function eventually becomes unnecessary. Organizations should, however, ensure that these temporary measures do not evolve into a long-term crutch.


Type 7: Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) Team Model

Adopting Google’s SRE principles, this model features a dedicated SRE team that shares responsibilities between development and operations. After an initial trial period—typically around six months—once stability is achieved, operational responsibilities are gradually shifted to development teams. This model requires substantial engineering maturity and is best suited for organizations with advanced technical infrastructures.

The image describes the SRE Team (Google Model) in DevOps, highlighting team roles and collaboration, with a Venn diagram and a person speaking in the corner.


Type 8: Container-First (K8s) Approach

This model centers on containerization technologies, such as Kubernetes, where the entire application environment is encapsulated in containers. While this reduces the need for continuous collaboration between developers and operations, it places greater responsibility on developers to implement robust health checks and monitoring strategies for effective container management.


Type 9: Developer and DBA Collaboration

For organizations managing large and complex data sources, it is essential to bridge the gap between developers and database administrators (DBAs). This pattern emphasizes collaboration between those who treat data as a storage medium and DBAs who recognize data’s strategic value. Enhanced cooperation in this area leads to better leverage of data assets and supports data-driven decision making.

The image explains "Type 9: Dev and DBA Collaboration" in DevOps, featuring a Venn diagram and text on team collaboration and potential effectiveness.


Conclusion

These DevOps team topologies offer a framework for building a collaborative and efficient delivery process. Each model presents its own benefits and challenges, making it crucial for organizations to assess their unique context and requirements. By reviewing these patterns, teams can identify the approach—or combination of approaches—that best fits their operational needs as DevOps practices continue to evolve.

For additional insights and resources, consider exploring:

Watch Video

Watch video content

Previous
Teams vs Roles crossing teams