Design considerations for Foundation Model Applications

Welcome to this detailed lesson on designing applications with foundation models. In this guide, we will explore essential design considerations that directly impact performance, scalability, and cost efficiency. Whether you are building real-time applications or complex AI solutions, understanding these trade-offs is key to success.

Model Selection and Cost Considerations

When choosing a foundation model, it is crucial to balance cost, accuracy, latency, and precision. Consider these important questions:

Was the model pre-trained on a massive third-party dataset?
What are the cost implications associated with using this model?
How do its accuracy and inference speed compare when pitted against simpler alternatives?

Complex models generally provide higher accuracy but incur greater costs and slower inference times. On the other hand, simpler models offer faster processing and lower expense, though possibly at the expense of marginal accuracy.

The image discusses cost considerations between a "Simple Model" and a "Complex Model," highlighting that cost is a critical factor when selecting a foundation model.

For instance, when comparing a model with 98% accuracy that costs $500,000 (Model A) versus one with 97% accuracy that costs less than half as much (Model B), you must analyze whether the marginal gain in accuracy justifies the additional cost.

The image is a diagram titled "Cost Considerations," showing a progression from "More complex" to "More accurate" to "More expensive," with corresponding icons.

The image is a table comparing two models, A and B, based on their accuracy and cost. Model A has 98% accuracy and costs $500,000, while Model B has 97% accuracy and costs $150,000.

Latency is another pivotal factor. In applications such as real-time translation or self-driving vehicles, the model's inference speed is critical. While highly complex models may provide superior accuracy, they might not be suitable if they cannot meet real-time processing demands.

The image compares two models: a complex model with high accuracy but slow inference, and a simpler model with faster inference and acceptable accuracy loss.

Model Complexity and Inference

A practical example is the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) model used in self-driving vehicle systems. KNN models perform most of their computations during inference, making them computationally intensive. This characteristic renders them less ideal for real-time decision-making in high-dimensional scenarios. In these cases, opting for a more complex model may be necessary to balance inference speed with overall complexity.

The image illustrates a K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) concept, showing a blue diamond labeled "Nearest Neighbors" surrounded by green circles and orange diamonds, representing different data points. The title "Balancing Accuracy and Inference Speed" suggests a focus on optimizing these aspects in KNN.

Modality and Data Input Considerations

Modality refers to the type of input data a model can handle, such as text, images, and audio. While many simpler models are limited to one or two types of data, multimodal models can process multiple inputs concurrently. If you are dealing with single-input models, consider using ensemble methods to combine the outputs of several specialized models.

The image illustrates "Modality Considerations," showing how a model processes different types of input data: text, audio, and image. It explains that modality refers to the types of input data a model can handle.

Using ensemble methods not only broadens the types of supported data but often enhances the overall performance.

The image is a flowchart titled "Modality Considerations," showing outputs from three models being combined using an ensemble method to achieve better performance.

For global applications, assess whether incorporating multilingual capabilities is necessary, especially in scenarios like real-time translation.

The image highlights the importance of multilingual models for global applications, featuring an icon of a smartphone with translation symbols and the text "Real-Time Translation."

Choosing the Right Model Architecture

Different tasks require specific model architectures. For example:

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs): Ideal for image recognition tasks.
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs): Better suited for natural language processing (NLP).

Selecting the right architecture is a core component of MLOps and should align with your business problem and data characteristics.

The image compares the architectures of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), highlighting their input, hidden, and output layers.

Even if the technical specifics of CNNs and RNNs extend beyond this lesson, understanding their fundamental differences helps in evaluating their impact on infrastructure costs, training time, and inference efficiency.

The image illustrates the relationship between complexity and resource requirements, highlighting that higher complexity leads to higher accuracy but requires more computational resources, memory, processing power, increased infrastructure costs, and longer training and inference times.

Performance Metrics

Performance metrics are critical for evaluating model effectiveness. Some key metrics include:

Accuracy: How often the model makes correct predictions.
Precision: The quality of positive predictions, measured as the proportion of true positives among all positive predictions.
Recall: The model's ability to capture all relevant instances.
F1 Score: The harmonic mean of precision and recall, especially useful for imbalanced datasets.

The image displays a chart titled "Performance Metrics" with four labeled circles: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1 Score.

For certain tasks, mean average precision (MAP) may be used to average precision across multiple query types. Evaluation criteria vary by application—for instance, BLEU scores are popular in translation tasks, while sentiment analysis might require different metrics.

The image is a table titled "Performance Metrics" comparing three models (A, B, C) across four tasks (Sentiment Analysis, Question Answering, Translation, Text Summarization) with metrics for Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and MAP.

When dealing with imbalanced datasets, high accuracy might be misleading. In mission-critical areas such as medical diagnosis, false negatives could have severe consequences. Always evaluate metrics within the context of the specific application.

The image discusses trade-offs in performance metrics, highlighting that high accuracy may not ensure good precision or recall, accuracy can be unreliable with imbalanced datasets, and the right metrics help assess model effectiveness accurately.

Customizing Models

Customization can be achieved through different approaches:

Fine-Tuning: Minor adjustments such as adding system prompts or exposing the model to new data without retraining entirely.
Full Retraining: Offers complete control and specialization, but with higher costs and longer training durations.

Fine-tuning generally incurs lower costs while still improving model specificity.

The image is a comparison chart of customizing pre-trained models, contrasting fine-tuning with full retraining, highlighting differences in adjustments, resource requirements, and suitability for tasks.

Always analyze these trade-offs holistically, considering model complexity, performance metrics, and cost implications together.

The image compares cost trade-offs in model customization between fine-tuning and pre-training, highlighting that fine-tuning is less costly with limited adjustments, while pre-training is more expensive with complete control.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances model responses by retrieving additional, relevant documents during the query process. This technique merges retrieval-based methods with generative models, thereby improving the quality of answers in customer-facing applications. The process involves:

Receiving a prompt.
Retrieving pertinent data from a knowledge base.
Combining this information with the initial query.
Sending the enriched prompt to a large language model to generate the final response.

The image is a flowchart illustrating the Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) process, showing how prompts and queries interact with knowledge sources and large language models to generate text responses.

Implementing RAG can add complexity and cost due to the need for managing external knowledge sources, but the improved contextual accuracy can be a significant benefit.

Storing Embeddings in Vector Databases

Embeddings are numerical representations of tokens derived from input queries. Storing these embeddings in vector databases enables efficient semantic retrieval—especially useful when managing large, predefined knowledge bases. Options for vector databases include:

Database Technology	Use Case	Example
DocumentDB	Document-oriented storage and querying	Use for structured documents
Neptune	Graph database to capture relationships	Ideal for connected data
RDS with Postgres	Traditional relational database	General-purpose applications
Aurora with Postgres	Scalable, managed relational database	High performance, scalable
OpenSearch	Search engine with vector support	Semantic search and retrieval

The image is about storing embeddings in vector databases, featuring Amazon Bedrock and Amazon Kendra, and highlights their use in enhancing foundation model performance for semantic search and document retrieval.

Conclusion

Balancing cost, latency, and model complexity is paramount when designing AI solutions with foundation models. By carefully evaluating performance metrics, customizing models appropriately, and employing techniques like RAG and vector databases, you can tailor your solution to meet specific business objectives with efficiency and precision.

Note

For more insights and detailed documentation on model evaluation and deployment best practices, explore our MLOps Guidelines.

Thank you for reading this lesson. Stay tuned for future posts covering advanced topics like RAG, vector databases, and more in-depth model customization strategies.

Watch Video

Watch video content