AZ-400: Designing and Implementing Microsoft DevOps Solutions

Implementing an Orchestration Automation Solution

Release Strategies

In today's fast-paced software landscape, balancing rapid innovation with system stability is critical. Historically, IT teams enforced strict controls over deployments to minimize risk, while development teams pushed for new features. This disconnect led to lengthy release cycles and organizational friction.

Agile methodologies narrowed the gap between business and development, and DevOps extends that collaboration into operations. By removing silos and fostering end-to-end automation, organizations can deliver value faster without compromising quality.

The image illustrates the "Traditional IT Development Cycle," depicting a "Wall of Confusion" between the development (Dev) and operations (Ops) teams.

Silos and Their Impact

When teams operate in isolation, innovation stalls and handoffs become bottlenecks.

  • Barriers to knowledge sharing
  • Extending project timelines
  • Reduced experimentation
  • Duplication of effort

The image illustrates the impacts of silo-driven development, highlighting barriers to knowledge sharing, delayed project timelines, reduced innovation, and duplication of efforts.

Breaking Down Silos with DevOps

DevOps transforms the traditional Dev→Ops handoff into a shared responsibility model through:

  • Collaboration: Cross-functional teams co-own design, deployment, and monitoring.
  • CI/CD Automation: Automated builds, tests, and deployments provide consistent feedback.
  • Continuous Improvement: An “infinite loop” of planning, coding, testing, and operating cultivates shared ownership and accountability.

The image illustrates how DevOps addresses silo-driven issues, featuring an infinity loop with stages like code, build, test, release, deploy, monitor, and operate. It highlights benefits such as promoting collaboration, implementing CI/CD, and encouraging shared responsibilities.


The Release Process Overview

A robust release process defines how code transforms into production-ready features. A typical workflow includes:

  1. Code commit
  2. Build & package
  3. Automated testing (unit & integration)
  4. Review & approval
  5. Deploy to staging
  6. Deploy to production

The image illustrates a release process flowchart, detailing key components of CI/CD pipelines, including stages like code commit, build, unit test, integration tests, review, staging, and production.


Continuous Integration (CI)

Continuous Integration emphasizes frequent merges to a central repository, ensuring early detection of defects.

  • Automated builds triggered on every commit
  • Self-testing pipelines with unit and integration tests
  • Rapid feedback loops via dashboards
  • Reproducible environments (often containerized)
  • Single source of truth for code

Note

Implementing CI with clear build and test stages reduces integration headaches and accelerates development.

The image lists the core principles of Continuous Integration, including maintaining a single source repository, automating builds, and ensuring builds are self-testing. It emphasizes fast builds, easy access to deliverables, transparency, and automated deployment.


Continuous Delivery (CD)

Continuous Delivery extends CI by ensuring every change is deployable. Key concepts:

  • Release: A versioned package of artifacts ready for deployment.
  • Deployment: Execution of tasks (infrastructure provisioning, application install) that bring a release into a running state.

Understanding these distinctions is vital when configuring tools like Azure Pipelines, Jenkins, or GitHub Actions.


YAML Pipelines

Defining your release process as code makes it version-controlled, auditable, and reproducible. Azure DevOps, GitLab CI/CD, and other platforms use YAML to declare pipelines.

The image illustrates a release process in a YAML pipeline, showing stages from code commit through CI and CD pipelines to production. It includes steps like build, unit test, integration tests, review, staging, and production.

Pipeline Structure

ElementDescription
TriggerEvent that starts the pipeline (e.g., commit to main).
StageLogical grouping of jobs (e.g., Build, Test, Deploy).
JobContainer for one or more steps, executed on an agent.
StepIndividual task or script command.

The image illustrates the structure of a YAML pipeline, showing a hierarchy of pipeline, stage, and steps, with components like agent, job, script, and task.

The image illustrates the structure of a YAML pipeline, showing the flow from a trigger through stages, agents, jobs, and steps, with tasks like publishing build artifacts and deploying Azure app services.


Designing Your Release Strategy

Tailor your pipeline to your organization’s size, regulatory requirements, and team expertise:

  1. Start Simple

    • Build a minimal pipeline for one environment.
    • Validate each stage before adding complexity.
  2. Incremental Improvement

    • Introduce new tests, stages, or approvals gradually.
    • Use analytics to optimize performance.
  3. Environment Focus

    • Perfect CI/CD for development before scaling to staging and production.
  4. Small Batches

    • Deploy features in bite-sized updates to simplify rollbacks and diagnostics.

The image illustrates the stages of Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Deployment (CD), showing the process flow from building, testing, to creating artifacts. Each stage includes specific tasks like getting the repository, compiling, running tests, and publishing results.

In CI:

  • Get the repo
  • Compile code
  • Run unit tests
  • Publish test results
  • Build and publish artifacts

In CD:

  • Retrieve artifacts
  • Deploy to servers
  • Run integration tests
  • Publish deployment results

The image illustrates the stages of continuous deployment, highlighting the "Install" and "Test" phases, with tasks like getting artifacts, deploying, running integration tests, and publishing test results.

Environments

EnvironmentPurposeCommon Tools
DevelopmentDeveloper sandbox for feature workLocal Docker, Minikube
Staging/AcceptanceBusiness validation and UATAzure App Service, Kubernetes
ProductionLive application serving end usersAKS, App Service, Lambda

CI produces the artifact; CD reliably deploys it across these stages.

The image illustrates a flowchart of release environments, showing the process from "Artifact/Package" to "Production" through stages labeled "Development" and "Acceptance," under the categories CI (Continuous Integration) and CD (Continuous Deployment).


Release Strategy Best Practices

  • Automate Everything: Leverage Azure Pipelines, GitHub Actions, or Jenkins.
  • Maintain Environment Parity: Use Infrastructure as Code (e.g., Terraform, ARM templates).
  • Monitor Continuously: Integrate logging and alerting (e.g., Azure Monitor, Prometheus).
  • Prepare a Rollback Plan: Small, frequent releases simplify recovery.

Warning

Neglecting a rollback strategy increases downtime risk. Always version your artifacts and test rollback procedures in non-production environments.

The image outlines best practices for designing a release strategy, including automation, environment consistency, and rollback strategies.


Watch Video

Watch video content

Previous
Introduction Implementing an Orchestration Automation Solution