Types of source control systems

In this article, we explore the two primary types of source control systems: centralized and distributed. Understanding these systems and their use cases is essential for effective code management and collaboration.

Centralized Source Control

Centralized source control systems rely on a single repository as the authoritative hub for all code changes. Developers submit their modifications directly to this central repository, ensuring that everyone works from the same version of the codebase. Popular examples include Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC), Concurrent Versions System (CVS), Apache Subversion (SVN), and Perforce Helix Core.

The image lists examples of centralized source control systems: Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC), Concurrent Versions System (CVS), Apache Subversion (SVN), and Perforce Helix Core.

Advantages of Centralized Source Control

Scalability: Efficiently manages large codebases.
Access Management: Provides granular permission control.
Usage Oversight: Maintains a detailed track record of user actions.
Exclusive Control: Enables file locking to prevent conflicts from concurrent edits.

Ideal Applications for Centralized Source Control

Unified Code Repositories: Best for large, single-codebase projects that require consistency.
Detailed Oversight Environments: Suitable for projects demanding audit trails and file-level access controls.
Complex File Merging Needs: Effective for handling file types that are challenging to merge.

Distributed Source Control

Distributed source control systems empower developers to create local copies of the entire repository, including its full history. This decentralization increases autonomy, facilitates offline work, and ensures robust redundancy.

The image illustrates a distributed source control system, showing interactions between a central server repository and two systems (A and B) with pull, push, commit, and replace actions.

Examples of Distributed Source Control

Git
Mercurial

Key Strengths of Distributed Source Control

The image lists examples of distributed source control systems: Git and Mercurial.

Flexibility Across Environments: Works seamlessly on multiple operating systems.
Community-Centric Development: Promotes a collaborative culture with pull requests and code reviews.
Full Functionality Offline: Developers can work without an internet connection.
Complete Local Repository: Every contributor has access to the entire project history.
Expanding Popularity: Benefits from a growing community of users and contributors.

The image is a slide titled "Distributed Source Control – Key Strengths," highlighting five strengths: flexibility across environments, community-centric development, full functionality offline, history on-the-go, and growing popularity.

Ideal Applications for Distributed Source Control

Compact Codebases: Ideal for modular projects with smaller digital footprints.
Open Source Projects: Supports the open source model with efficient collaboration and code review processes.
Remote Collaboration: Well-suited for geographically dispersed teams.
Cross-Platform Development: Fits teams operating on different development platforms.

The image is a slide titled "Distributed Source Control – Ideal Applications," listing four applications: efficient for compact codebases, open-source projects, remote collaboration, and cross-platform development. Each application is highlighted in a different colored box.

This model is also ideal for initiating new projects without the constraints of a pre-existing codebase.

Git versus Team Foundation Version Control

Git

Git employs a decentralized approach where every developer maintains a complete local repository. This setup allows for dedicated feature branches, increasing isolation and reducing the risk of impacting the main codebase. By keeping a full, local copy of the project’s history, Git not only promotes autonomy but also enhances reliability in code management.

The image is a comparison between Git and Team Foundation Version Control, highlighting Git's decentralized approach and local repository management versus TFVC's centralized framework and server-based file management.

Using pull requests, developers can merge their feature branches into the main branch. This method streamlines code integration while facilitating essential code reviews and collaborative discussions.

The image outlines reasons for selecting Git for source control, highlighting decentralized repositories with a diagram showing multiple full repositories. It also lists other reasons like branching for features and collaboration with the community.

The image is a slide titled "Selecting Git for Source Control – Reasons," highlighting five reasons, with a focus on "Integration via Pull Requests," and includes a diagram illustrating feature branching and merging.

Git’s distributed nature enhances team collaboration and supports modern practices like continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD), making it a preferred choice for rapid release cycles and iterative development.

Additional Information

Git is widely adopted due to its flexibility and robust community support. It plays a crucial role in modern DevOps pipelines and agile workflows.

Objections to Using Git

Despite its many advantages, Git comes with some challenges:

The image outlines reasons for selecting Git for source control, including branching for features, decentralized repositories, and feedback-driven releases, with a diagram illustrating the feedback loop between users and customers.

History Management: Mistakes in Git can lead to complications when rewriting history, potentially causing conflicts.
Handling Large Files: Git is optimized for smaller repositories. For large files or binaries, integrating Git with Large File Storage (LFS) is recommended.
Steep Learning Curve: The initial learning phase for Git can be challenging, necessitating additional training for both new and experienced developers.

The image lists three objections to using Git: history management, handling of voluminous files, and educational investment. Each objection is briefly explained in separate colored boxes.

Watch Video

Watch video content