Skip to main content
In this article, we’ll compare Helm and Kustomize—two popular methods for managing Kubernetes manifests across different environments. Understanding their strengths, workflows, and trade-offs will help you select the best fit for your project.

How Helm Works: Go-Templating in YAML

Helm uses Go templates to inject dynamic values into your Kubernetes manifests. Placeholders in the form of {{ .Values.variable }} are replaced at deploy time based on a values.yaml file.
When you run helm install my-app ./chart -f values.yaml, Helm merges the values into the templates, producing valid Kubernetes YAML:
Use --values (or -f) to specify different environment files, e.g., -f values.prod.yaml.

Helm Chart Structure

A typical Helm chart directory might look like:
  • templates/: Kubernetes manifests with Go templating syntax.
  • environments/: Separate values.*.yaml files for each environment.

Feature Comparison

Complex Helm charts with extensive logic can become hard to read and maintain. Ensure you document templates and values clearly.

Trade-offs: When to Use Each Tool

  • Use Helm if
    • You need advanced templating (conditionals, loops, custom functions)
    • You want packaging, versioning, and chart dependencies
    • You require lifecycle hooks (e.g., pre-install, post-upgrade)
  • Use Kustomize if
    • You prefer pure YAML without an extra rendering step
    • You want easy-to-read overlays and patches
    • Your customization needs are straightforward (e.g., changing images, labels)
Balance your project’s complexity and team familiarity when choosing between the two.
The image is a slide comparing Kustomize and Helm, highlighting Helm's features such as being a package manager, providing conditionals, loops, functions, and hooks, and noting that Helm templates are not valid YAML due to Go templating syntax.

References

Watch Video