Skip to main content
This guide demonstrates how to create a precise, implementation-ready technical specification document for an Image Optimizer project. The workflow uses an LLM (blackbox.ai) to generate an initial draft, then shows how to systematically review and refine that draft so it becomes a reliable source-of-truth for engineering teams. Key outcomes:
  • Produce a clear, actionable technical spec that includes architecture, requirements, API examples, and data models.
  • Trim LLM-generated content to match the project’s minimal viable product (MVP).
  • Establish validation and export steps to put the spec into your repository.
We begin by prompting blackbox.ai with a detailed request describing the desired sections and structure.
A browser screenshot showing an "Image Optimizer Technical Specification Document" with a title page, abstract, and table of contents. The page displays project metadata (name, version, authors) and an overview-style layout.
The generated draft included a title page and a table of contents, but left personal metadata as placeholders. Use the title page template as a starting point; populate author, version, and date with project-specific values before committing the file to your repo. Next, the LLM produced an Overview section listing target audiences and example use cases. Evaluate and adjust the audience list so it aligns with the real users for your product — for example, a hosted API for e-commerce websites vs. an internal command-line tool for content teams.
A browser screenshot of a webpage titled "Overview" describing an Image Optimizer tool, with sections for Target Audience and Use Case Scenarios. The page lists bullet points like web developers, digital marketing teams, e-commerce businesses, and content creators.
Review functional requirements carefully. The LLM may propose features outside your target scope (e.g., resizing, batch processing, or user authentication). Keep only the features that match the MVP and move optional features into a “Future roadmap” section. Common LLM-suggested functional requirements (trim or edit to match scope):
  • Upload and compress images in common formats (JPEG, PNG, WebP).
  • Provide downloadable optimized images.
  • Show before-and-after file sizes for verification (keep if required).
  • (Potentially out-of-scope items to remove) Image resizing, mass/batch processing, and user account management.
For non-functional requirements (latency targets, throughput, concurrency), replace LLM defaults with realistic, measured values based on your infrastructure and load tests. The draft’s System Design typically lists common components: frontend, backend image processor, object storage, and caching. For an MVP, prune unnecessary subsystems (e.g., remove user DB or OAuth if not needed). The next screenshot shows a typical “Technologies Used” section from the LLM draft — use it as a checklist and swap items to match your stack.
A screenshot of a web page (in Chrome) showing a "Technologies Used" section that lists frontend/back-end tools like React.js, Node.js/Express, Sharp, MongoDB and AWS S3, followed by an "API Specifications" section with endpoints. The page appears to be documentation for an image-handling service.
API specification and data model snippets from the LLM are useful starting points. Keep or refine these examples to match the final design. Below are cleaned and structured examples you can adapt. API Specifications (example)
Security and transport guidance (example):
  • Enforce HTTPS for all client-server communications.
  • If authentication is added later, consider JWT with short expiry and refresh tokens, or an OAuth2 flow for third-party integrations.
  • Sanitize and validate uploaded files (MIME type checks, content scanning for malware).
Data Models and Storage (example)
Use a simple components table to summarize roles and deployment considerations: Refinement checklist — practical steps to convert LLM draft into a team-ready spec:
  • Remove features not in MVP (e.g., user accounts, batch jobs, resizing) and place them in a future-features backlog.
  • Replace generated technology recommendations with your chosen stack, and document trade-offs.
  • Update non-functional requirements with realistic numbers from load and latency testing.
  • Remove any optional diagrams or components not being deployed; ensure architecture diagrams show only current components.
  • Convert placeholder metadata (author, version, date) to real values before committing.
Further notes on validation:
  • Have a technical lead review the spec for correctness.
  • Run a short spike or POC to validate critical assumptions (e.g., compression speed and quality).
  • Add acceptance criteria to each functional requirement: e.g., “Upload and optimization should succeed for a 2MB PNG within 3s under normal load.”
The generated specification is a strong starting point, but it requires human review and iterative refinement to match the exact feature set, performance targets, and chosen technologies for your project.
Do not treat LLM output as final. Validate API contracts, performance targets, and security controls with real tests and a technical review before implementation.
Once refined — removing unwanted features, locking technology choices, and adjusting performance targets — export the final specification and add it to your repository as the canonical technical document. Maintain it alongside your roadmap and issue tracker to keep requirements and implementation aligned.

Watch Video