Skip to main content
This article explains Amazon EC2 placement groups — what they are, why they exist, and when to use each type. Placement groups let you control how EC2 instances are placed on the underlying AWS infrastructure so you can optimize for either performance (low latency, high throughput) or fault isolation (reducing correlated failures). This topic is commonly tested on AWS certification exams (for example, the AWS Solutions Architect Associate Certification), so pay attention to their trade-offs.
Placement groups let you control EC2 instance placement across racks and hosts. Choose between cluster, partition, and spread placement groups based on whether you need maximum network performance, rack-level fault isolation, or strict hardware separation.
Why use placement groups?
  • Optimize network performance for tightly-coupled, high-throughput workloads (cluster).
  • Limit blast radius by isolating groups of instances on separate racks or partitions (partition).
  • Ensure critical or singleton instances do not share underlying hardware (spread).
Overview: placement group types
  • Cluster — packs instances close together (single AZ) to maximize inter-instance network throughput and minimize latency.
  • Partition — divides a group into partitions with rack-level isolation for fault-tolerant distributed clusters spanning one or more AZs.
  • Spread — places each instance on distinct hardware to minimize correlated failures for critical instances.
Below are the detailed descriptions, use cases, and considerations for each placement group type, with visual references.
A presentation slide titled "EC2 Instance Placements – Types" that focuses on "Spread Placement Group." It lists three points: instances are spread across distinct hardware, reducing correlated failures, and it's ideal for critical instances needing isolation.
Cluster placement groups
  • Purpose: Place instances in very close physical proximity within a single Availability Zone to achieve low-latency, high-throughput networking between instances.
  • Ideal for: High-performance computing (HPC), big data frameworks (e.g., Hadoop), and distributed machine learning workloads using GPUs/FPUs that require high inter-node bandwidth.
Cluster placement groups are single-AZ only and work best when instances are homogeneous and support enhanced networking or Elastic Fabric Adapter (EFA).
A slide titled "Cluster Placement Group" showing two benefits — "Low-latency network performance" and "High network throughput" — alongside a green-bordered diagram of six orange server/instance icons arranged to represent a same-rack availability zone.
Common cluster use cases:
A presentation slide titled "Cluster Placement Group – Use Cases" showing three numbered panels with icons. The panels list: 01 High-Performance Computing (HPC), 02 Big data analytics (e.g., Apache Hadoop), and 03 Machine learning with GPU/FPGA.
Cluster placement group limitations and considerations:
  • Single-AZ only — cannot span multiple Availability Zones.
  • Some instance types are unsupported; prefer current-generation instance types that support enhanced networking/EFA.
  • Network throughput is limited by the least-capable instance in the group — mix carefully or avoid mixing.
  • Enhanced networking and EFA are supported on compatible instances for lowest latency and highest throughput.
  • Capacity planning: On-Demand Capacity Reservations may be required to guarantee capacity; Reserved Instances only affect billing and do not reserve capacity by themselves.
A presentation slide titled "Limitations" with a turquoise left panel and colored bullet points on the right listing constraints such as supported instance types, single-AZ-only cluster placement, and network throughput limits. A small "© Copyright KodeKloud" appears at the bottom.
Additional cluster notes:
  • Placement groups optimize physical placement but do not increase external (Internet or cross-AZ) bandwidth beyond the instance or VPC network limits.
  • EFAs are commonly used with cluster placement groups for HPC applications requiring RDMA and very low latency.
A presentation slide titled "Limitations" with a turquoise left panel and three bullet points describing issues: mixed instance types, capacity reservations, and a 5 Gbps external traffic limit. The notes recommend using the same instance type and On‑Demand Capacity Reservations for guaranteed capacity.
Cluster summary
  • Pros: Low latency and high bandwidth between instances, EFA support, ideal for tightly-coupled compute.
  • Cons: Single AZ, capacity constraints, recommended homogeneous instance types, may require redeploying to scale beyond available capacity.
A presentation slide titled "Cluster Placement Group – Advantages and Limitations." It shows pros in green (low latency/high bandwidth, improved network performance, EFA support) and cons in orange (single availability zone, capacity limits, homogeneous instance types).
Partition placement groups
  • Purpose: Provide rack-level fault isolation by dividing the placement group into partitions. Each partition maps to a distinct set of racks, network, and power so that partitions do not share racks with each other.
  • Ideal for: Large distributed databases and stateful distributed systems (e.g., Cassandra, HBase) where you need to reduce correlated failures while supporting a cluster that spans many instances, potentially across multiple AZs.
A diagram titled "Partition Placement Group" showing the Us‑east‑1a availability zone divided into three partitions (Partition 1, 2, 3), each containing two orange compute/instance icons.
Key points about partition placement groups:
  • Partitions can be distributed across multiple Availability Zones; each partition provides rack-level isolation within its AZ.
  • Good for horizontally scalable, fault-tolerant distributed systems.
  • Use multiple partitions (and distribute them across AZs) to achieve multi-AZ redundancy.
  • Default limits typically include up to seven partitions per AZ (subject to account limits). Verify your account limits before planning.
  • Capacity reservations and instance/feature limits may differ versus cluster placement groups — consult current AWS docs.
A presentation slide titled "Partition Placement Group – Advantages and Limitations" with a green "Pros" column listing fault isolation, scalability, and improved fault tolerance. On the right is an orange "Cons" column listing single availability zone and complexity.
Partition summary
  • Pros: Rack-level fault isolation, scalable for large clusters, improved tolerance to rack failures.
  • Cons: More operational complexity and planning for AZ distribution, and some instance or feature limits may apply.
Spread placement groups
  • Purpose: Place each instance on distinct underlying hardware (separate racks/hosts) to minimize the chance of simultaneous failures.
  • Ideal for: Critical singletons or small sets of instances that must be isolated from one another (e.g., authentication servers, DNS, bastion hosts, control plane components).
A diagram titled "Spread Placement Group" showing three availability zones (us-east-1a, us-east-1b, us-east-1c), each containing two hardware/instance icons. A caption explains that spread placement groups distribute instances across different racks to reduce simultaneous failures.
Spread placement group considerations:
  • There is a per-AZ instance limit within a single spread placement group (often small — e.g., seven instances per AZ; check current AWS limits).
  • Spread placement groups prioritize hardware isolation over network performance; inter-instance latency and bandwidth are not optimized.
  • Some deployment types (Dedicated Hosts, Outposts) may behave differently with placement groups — verify support for your environment.
  • Capacity reservations behave differently; confirm the exact behavior in the AWS documentation for your use case.
A slide titled "Spread Placement Group – Advantages and Limitations" showing pros on the left (high availability, fault tolerance, multiple AZ support) and cons on the right (limited instances per AZ, not optimized for network performance).
Spread summary
  • Pros: Strong isolation and reduced correlated failure risk; suitable for critical singleton instances.
  • Cons: Small instance counts per AZ per group and higher network latency vs cluster placement groups.
Quick comparison and decision guide Decision checklist
  • Need optimized inter-instance network performance? Choose cluster.
  • Need rack-level isolation for large distributed systems? Choose partition.
  • Need strict hardware separation for critical single instances? Choose spread.
Check current AWS documentation and your account limits before designing: supported instance types, per-AZ limits, and capacity reservation behavior can change and may differ by region and account.
Links and references Thanks for reading — remember the three placement-group types (cluster, partition, spread) and choose based on required network performance, fault isolation, and instance-level separation for your architecture and exam preparation.

Watch Video