Demo Query a New Fruit Across 3 Searches

Welcome back. This tutorial assumes you already have LanceDB set up with vectors for several fruits and that a mango query vector is defined. We’ll:

Reload the stored fruit vectors from LanceDB,
Visualize vectors in 3D and 2D (Red vs Yellow) color-space,
Run three similarity/distance searches (Cosine similarity, Euclidean distance, Dot product),
Compare rankings and visualize metric differences.

If you’re following along in a fresh notebook, run each code block sequentially so variables (like fruit_vectors and mango_query) are available for plotting and metric computation.

1) Reload LanceDB and fruit vectors

Run this in a fresh notebook cell to ensure data is present:

import numpy as np
import lancedb
from pathlib import Path

DB_PATH = Path("fruits_lancedb")
TABLE_NAME = "fruit_vectors"

db = lancedb.connect(str(DB_PATH))
table = db.open_table(TABLE_NAME)
stored = table.to_pandas()
fruit_vectors = {row.name: np.array(row.vector) for row in stored.itertuples()}

mango_query = np.array([0.9, 0.34, 0.08])

print(f"🔄 Reloaded {len(fruit_vectors)} fruits from LanceDB")
print(f"🍑 Mango query vector: {mango_query}")

This confirms the dataset is available and shows the query vector we will search with. Verify the loaded fruits and their vectors:

print(f"Reloaded {len(fruit_vectors)} fruits from LanceDB")
print(f"Mango query vector: {mango_query}")
print("\nStored fruits:")
for name, vec in fruit_vectors.items():
    print(f"{name:9} -> {vec}")

Example console output:

Reloaded 8 fruits from LanceDB
Mango query vector: [0.9  0.34 0.08]

Stored fruits:
papaya    -> [0.80 0.35 0.05]
peach     -> [0.82 0.41 0.38]
pear      -> [0.89 0.42 0.54]
pineapple -> [0.75 0.64 0.45]
apple     -> [0.44 0.52 0.36]
apricot   -> [0.41 0.47 0.52]
guava     -> [0.39 0.58 0.31]
nectarine -> [0.48 0.72 0.68]

2) Visualize the vectors (3D and 2D projection)

Plot the fruit vectors in 3D color-space plus a 2D top-down projection (Red vs Yellow). This helps reason about which fruits should be nearest the mango query by color.

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D  # noqa: F401 (needed for 3D projection)

# Prepare data for plotting
names = list(fruit_vectors.keys())
vectors = np.array(list(fruit_vectors.values()))

fig = plt.figure(figsize=(12, 5))

# Plot 1: 3D scatter plot
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(121, projection='3d')
ax1.scatter(vectors[:, 0], vectors[:, 1], vectors[:, 2], s=100, alpha=0.6, label='Fruits', c='blue')
ax1.scatter(mango_query[0], mango_query[1], mango_query[2], c='red', s=200, marker='*', label='Mango Query')

for i, name in enumerate(names):
    ax1.text(vectors[i, 0], vectors[i, 1], vectors[i, 2], name, fontsize=8)

ax1.set_xlabel('Red')
ax1.set_ylabel('Yellow')
ax1.set_zlabel('Green')
ax1.set_title('Fruit Vectors in 3D Color Space')
ax1.legend()

# Plot 2: 2D projection (Red vs Yellow)
ax2 = fig.add_subplot(122)
ax2.scatter(vectors[:, 0], vectors[:, 1], c='blue', s=100, alpha=0.6, label='Fruits')
ax2.scatter(mango_query[0], mango_query[1], c='red', s=200, marker='*', label='Mango Query')

for i, name in enumerate(names):
    ax2.annotate(name, (vectors[i, 0], vectors[i, 1]), fontsize=8)

ax2.set_xlabel('Red Intensity')
ax2.set_ylabel('Yellow Intensity')
ax2.set_title('Red vs Yellow (Top View)')
ax2.legend()
ax2.grid(True, alpha=0.3)

plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()

print("\nNotice how fruits with similar colors cluster together!")
print("Papaya, nectarine, peach, and apricot are in the high-red corner (top-right).")

The image is a screenshot of a Jupyter Notebook displaying a 3D and 2D plot showing fruit vectors in color space, with fruits represented by blue dots and a mango query by a red star, illustrating clustering based on color similarity.

This visualization should make it intuitive which fruits are likely nearest the mango query (for example: papaya, peach, nectarine).

3) Define and compute three similarity/distance metrics

We will compare three commonly used metrics:

Metric	What it measures	Matching rule
Cosine similarity	Angle between vectors (direction), normalized for magnitude	Higher = more similar
Euclidean distance	Straight-line distance in vector space (magnitude-sensitive)	Lower = more similar
Dot product	Unnormalized projection combining direction and magnitude	Higher = more similar (if magnitudes are meaningful)

Compute each metric and produce sorted rankings:

import numpy as np
from typing import Dict, List, Tuple

def cosine_similarity(a: np.ndarray, b: np.ndarray) -> float:
    """Cosine similarity (higher = more similar)."""
    return float(np.dot(a, b) / (np.linalg.norm(a) * np.linalg.norm(b)))

def euclidean_distance(a: np.ndarray, b: np.ndarray) -> float:
    """Euclidean distance (lower = more similar)."""
    return float(np.linalg.norm(a - b))

def dot_product(a: np.ndarray, b: np.ndarray) -> float:
    """Dot product (higher = more similar if magnitudes are meaningful)."""
    return float(np.dot(a, b))

# Compute rankings for each metric
metrics_results: Dict[str, List[Tuple[str, float]]] = {
    "Cosine Similarity (higher = more similar)": sorted(
        [(name, cosine_similarity(vec, mango_query)) for name, vec in fruit_vectors.items()],
        key=lambda x: x[1],
        reverse=True
    ),
    "Euclidean Distance (lower = more similar)": sorted(
        [(name, euclidean_distance(vec, mango_query)) for name, vec in fruit_vectors.items()],
        key=lambda x: x[1]
    ),
    "Dot Product (higher = more similar)": sorted(
        [(name, dot_product(vec, mango_query)) for name, vec in fruit_vectors.items()],
        key=lambda x: x[1],
        reverse=True
    ),
}

Print a formatted comparison of rankings:

print("=" * 60)
print("|| SIMILARITY RANKINGS COMPARISON ||")
print("=" * 60)

for metric_name, ranking in metrics_results.items():
    print(f"\n{metric_name}:")
    for rank, (name, value) in enumerate(ranking, start=1):
        print(f"  {rank}. {name:12} {value:.4f}")

Observed ordering (example from these vectors):

Cosine top 3: papaya, peach, pear
Euclidean top 3: papaya, peach, pear
Dot product top 3: pear, pineapple, peach

To extract the top-k results for quick comparison:

# Get top 5 for each metric
top_cosine = [x[0] for x in metrics_results["Cosine Similarity (higher = more similar)"][:5]]
top_euclidean = [x[0] for x in metrics_results["Euclidean Distance (lower = more similar)"][:5]]
top_dot = [x[0] for x in metrics_results["Dot Product (higher = more similar)"][:5]]

print("🏆 Top 5 Fruits by Each Metric:")
print("-" * 50)
print(f"Cosine: {top_cosine} | Euclidean: {top_euclidean} | Dot Product: {top_dot}")

Note: all three metrics can often agree on which items are closest (e.g., papaya is near the top for cosine and Euclidean), but they can disagree on exact ordering because they emphasize different vector properties (direction vs magnitude).

4) Visualize metric scores

A bar chart or grouped bar plot makes it easier to compare scores across metrics and highlight how one metric (e.g., dot product) can favor high-magnitude vectors like pear.

The image shows a Jupyter notebook interface with a code snippet and visualizations comparing fruit similarity across three metrics: Cosine Similarity, Euclidean Distance, and Dot Product. The bars indicate that papaya is the top match across all metrics.

Summary and next steps

print("=" * 60)
print("🔴 Stage 2 COMPLETE!")
print("=" * 60)
print("\n📝 What you learned:")
print("  1. Visualized fruit vectors in 3D color space")
print("  2. Compared 3 different similarity metrics (cosine, euclidean, dot product)")
print("  3. Saw how rankings can differ while the top result may still agree")
print("\n👉 Next steps:")
print("  - Try changing the mango_query vector and observe how results change.")
print("  - In real applications, you'd use embedding models (e.g., sentence-transformers: https://www.sbert.net/)")
print("    to create vectors from text; search logic is the same.")

Similarity search powers recommendation engines and RAG (retrieval-augmented generation). In recommendations it matches queries to products and user embeddings (purchase history); in RAG it retrieves documents that ground generation, making ranking quality critical to final output quality.

Practical tips:

In recommendation systems, a short query like shoe combined with a user embedding quickly improves relevance (sports vs formal vs ski).
In RAG, better similarity ranking yields more useful supporting documents and better generated answers.

References:

LanceDB: https://github.com/lancedb/lance
Sentence-Transformers (for real-world text embeddings): https://www.sbert.net/

Demo Query a New Fruit Across 3 Searches

1) Reload LanceDB and fruit vectors

2) Visualize the vectors (3D and 2D projection)

3) Define and compute three similarity/distance metrics

4) Visualize metric scores

Summary and next steps

Watch Video

Practice Lab

​1) Reload LanceDB and fruit vectors

​2) Visualize the vectors (3D and 2D projection)

​3) Define and compute three similarity/distance metrics

​4) Visualize metric scores

​Summary and next steps

Watch Video

Practice Lab

1) Reload LanceDB and fruit vectors

2) Visualize the vectors (3D and 2D projection)

3) Define and compute three similarity/distance metrics

4) Visualize metric scores

Summary and next steps